<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>TextFugu  &#187;  Topic: Tall vs. High</title>
		<atom:link href="http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/feed/</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 08:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13713</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13713</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 03:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>thisiskyle</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Does anyone say &#8220;The Eiffel Tower is 324m high.&#8221;?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how they teach it here despite a native speaker (me) telling them it&#8217;s bogus.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13714</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13714</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 04:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Sheepy</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Its common for me to hear it used in that way, so I don&#8217;t think its that wrong, just a technicality, and I think most people wouldn&#8217;t blink an eye at it. Except maybe you? ^^</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13732</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13732</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>koichi</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Makes sense to me, too :P</p>
<p>I think &#8220;high&#8221; is just the (slightly) older way to describe tall things, and &#8220;tall&#8221; came into being popular more recently (last 30-40 years, I&#8217;d guess?). Then again, I&#8217;m just making stuff up, haha.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13762</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13762</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>thisiskyle</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>To me, &#8220;high&#8221; sounds like &#8220;above the ground&#8221;. If I were standing on top of the Eiffel Tower, I&#8217;d be 324m high not 324m tall (unfortunately). Planes fly high in the sky not tall in the sky. It&#8217;s the difference between a position and an extent, like &#8220;far&#8221; and &#8220;long&#8221;. to omoimasu.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13764</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13764</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>budonoseito</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Tall is relative. High is quantitative.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13766</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13766</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>thisiskyle</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I disagree with your statement that tall is relative. If that were the case, the question &#8220;How tall are you?&#8221; would not invite an answer like, say, &#8220;Six feet six,&#8221; but one like &#8220;Fairly.&#8221; I think both words are relative and quantitative but that they simply measure (or compare) different characteristics.</p>
<p>If you look at the opposites of the words, I think you can see where the discrepancy is (at least as I see it). You might think that the opposite of &#8220;tall&#8221; is &#8220;short&#8221;, but you&#8217;d be wrong. Another way to say &#8220;short&#8221; is &#8220;not very tall&#8221; which means that even short things are tall, maybe less tall than average, but still tall. I would say there is no opposite to tall. &#8220;High&#8221; on the other hand, does have an opposite but it&#8217;s not &#8220;low&#8221;, like you might expect, for the same reason &#8220;short&#8221; is not the opposite of &#8220;tall&#8221;; the opposite of &#8220;high&#8221; is &#8220;deep&#8221;.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13770</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: Tall vs. High]]></title>
					<link>http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/#post-13770</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 02:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>budonoseito</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, there is over lap. But the first definition of tall is having a relatively great height; of more than average stature. </p>
<p>As a math and IT person, I prefer rules. But, language is not that easy. :) </p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/tall-vs-high/feed/ ) in 0.28980 seconds, on Apr 27th, 2026 at 4:50 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Apr 27th, 2026 at 5:50 pm UTC -->