Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 2,806 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AJATT #39502

    Joel
    Member

    Pssh. All you’re missing is a thumbs-up and a cheesy grin. =P

    in reply to: AJATT #39485

    Joel
    Member

    … You’re not (gasp) advertising, are you? Because advertising is bad.

    And also, against the forum rules.

    in reply to: The "I found some Japanese I don't understand" thread. #39471

    Joel
    Member

    I think the moral of this story is: context is important.

    in reply to: Hey guys, from down-under. #39469

    Joel
    Member

    Sydney, here.

    By the way, “Ninkendo”?

    in reply to: Japanese Kanji Readings – On' and Kun' #39468

    Joel
    Member

    You need to learn both, but fortunately you don’t need to learn them in isolation – click on the kanji themselves, and it’ll bring up a new page with mnemonics and example words.

    in reply to: The "I found some Japanese I don't understand" thread. #39461

    Joel
    Member

    I’d lean towards using が, personally – 雨が好き has an implied 私は on the front.

    in reply to: 万 . Manatees are not vicious. #39438

    Joel
    Member

    Maybe you’ve got some manateenip in your pocket?

    But yeah, I’m not reall a big fan of many of Koichi’s mnemonics. Too often he tries to get you memorise a reading by engaging your senses, but tends to disconnect the eyes – as in, if the shape of the character itself can somehow invoke the reading, why not use that? I don’t know that it’s necessary to bring up manatees at all – what’s wrong with just “man”? A man doing ballet. He’s in the middle of a jump, with his arms outstretched – don’t know the technical term for that move. =)

    in reply to: は and が are going to give me a heart attack… #39437

    Joel
    Member

    The Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar? Or are you referring to a different book?

    in reply to: "Celadon! stick to the plan" they said… #39416

    Joel
    Member

    No, I’m just a rather prolific poster. =)

    in reply to: "Celadon! stick to the plan" they said… #39412

    Joel
    Member

    It’s not inevitable. I could just avoid posting in any of his threads.

    Ah, wait… D’oh.

    =P

    I have to admit, though, I was wondering why calling you a shade of blue would make you smile. =)

    in reply to: Quick question – 七人 #39368

    Joel
    Member

    The readings for 七 tend to be fairly interchangeable.

    in reply to: The "I found some Japanese I don't understand" thread. #39361

    Joel
    Member

    Basically, noun-modifying phrases are plain-form sentences that come immediately before a noun, and in doing so modify the noun. It’s basically exactly the same as using adjectives, except it’s a verb, and lets you say some pretty detailed things. We do have them in English, though they’re not quite so versatile – they’ll either appear as hyphenated gerunds or adjectivised verbs before nouns (as in “demon-slaying sword”) or else prefaced by “that” or “which” after nouns (as in “the house that Jack built”).

    They can get… complex. One gem that appears in a passage in my current textbook is:

    日本には東京のような、世界によく知られている都市がたくさんあります。

    One of the comprehension questions is “what’s the phrase that modifies 都市?” (Well, actually, the question was 「都市」を修飾するのは、どこからどこまでですか。)

     
    Answer: it’s everything from 東京 to いる

    in reply to: The "I found some Japanese I don't understand" thread. #39356

    Joel
    Member

    It’s a noun-modifying phrase. The phrase 母がくれた describes the noun 鳥. That is, it’s a given-by-mother bird.

    I haven’t actually looked at the lessons in a while – does Koichi ever cover noun-modifying phrases?

    in reply to: Importance of which reading is being used? #39354

    Joel
    Member

    This is one place where the rule of thumb fortunately holds true. Namely, 女の子 = kanji on their own = kun’yomi, whereas 女子 = kanji in a bunch = on’yomi.

    in reply to: Confused on the 3-stroke kanji radicals #39353

    Joel
    Member

    Aye, he overhauled how he does kanji, but doesn’t seem to have updated the links in lessons. Under the current system, the group-3 radicals are all the radicals he thinks you need to know in order to learn the three-stroke kanji (whereas originally, it was the list of all of the three-stroke radicals).

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 2,806 total)