Home Forums The Japanese Language Nominalization: の vs こと

This topic contains 11 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  MisterM2402 [Michael] 11 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #37870

    vanandrew
    Member

    Have been looking at the conditions of when to use の or  こと for nominalization as per:

    http://www.textfugu.com/season-6/nominalization/7-10/#top

    There’s one point:

    “こと tends to be used on things that are more abstract. ”

    Then examples with の & こと being used for すき & きらい.

    Shouldn’t just こと be used with すき & きらい, and not の, if こと is for abstract things?

    Or is this “abstract things use こと” one of those really flexible rules that gets broken a lot?

     

    #37892

    Joel
    Member

    Whew, Koichi. Way to illustrate that there’s a difference by making your examples exactly the same.

    Personally, I’d say that 食べること is “I like eating hamburgers in general” while 食べるの is “I like eating this hamburger that I’m holding in my hand”. Or “I’d like to eat that hamburger you’re holding”? =P

    #37897

    kanjiman8
    Member

    Just out of curiosity Joel, what resources are you using to learn Japanese? Any good recommendations?

     

    EDIT: Saw your mention some resources in this thread http://www.textfugu.com/bb/topic/aussie-in-dubai-learning-japanese-o/

    Question answered I guess, unless you want to add anything more :P

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by  kanjiman8.
    #37898

    Joel
    Member

    I’m studying for a diploma in Japanese at uni – we’re using the Nakama textbook. Or we have been, at least – starting third year next year, and Nakama has only two volumes. I’ve also been using Japanese for Busy People for self-study, and reading through the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar.

    Why, you going to tell me I’m completely wrong? =P

    #37902

    kanjiman8
    Member

    Not at all :P

    You’re way ahead of me in ability. I’m still in the beginner spectrum.  Was curious what you are using . Hmm, Nakama eh. I’ll take a look at that. The three volumes of DOJG don’t seem to be in stock on Amazon.

    #37987

    vanandrew
    Member

    Thanks Joel, that’s much better.

    It this lesson it also deals with こと が ある, and describes it as “to have the action.”, or “time when the action happens/happened.”

    Would it be fair to say another way to view this would be “to have the experience” or “to have had the experience (of that the action)”?

     

    #37988

    Joel
    Member

    Aye. In fact, that’s how I’d describe it first.

    #37989

    vanandrew
    Member

    Thanks, Mr Scottish-Japanese.

    #37993

    Is Joel Scottish…? I never knew.

    #38000

    Joel
    Member

    No, he’s just making a joke because I said “aye”. =P

    Mind you, I used to get asked if I were Canadian a lot, because I’d finish sentences online with “eh?”…

    Edit: Post number 38,000! Woo! Or as we say in these parts, 三万八千. =D

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 3 months ago by  Joel.
    #38006

    vanandrew
    Member

    Joel – I was going to credit you with being multi-lingual!

     

    Ha! Congrats!

    #38011

    Woah, for a minute there I thought you were saying that was YOUR 38,000th post o.O
    I was thinking “how much time does this guy spend on here?!” XD

    And we do say “aye” a lot, so it’s a reasonable assumption ;)

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.